"Believe it or not, loss of limbs can be caused by a vaeirty accidents and diseases that don't involve war. You'd think that research and advances in the field of robotics which could help to restore a great deal of life quality and dignity to a great many people would be seen as something positive.I guess the glass is always half empty for some people"Who do you think is behind the funding of this kind of research? The tobacco companies? 'Hey, loss of limbs is no longer an issue with smoking!' Sure, there are plenty of other reasons people lose limbs, but there is a vested interest from certain companies with the cash to have this kind of research done, quite possibly mainly for the army.The US army are almost as bad as the oil and pharmaceutical companies when it comes to doling out the big bucks for research which suits them. I certainly wouldn't put it past them to be behind this research, especially when it coincides with the exoskeleton research.I doubt you're arguing for all wars in general, because that would be ridiculous. So I'm going to have to guess that you're arguing against Bomber himself, in a pathetic attempt at making Bomber look stupid, and that's why you come across looking naive.

"Believe it or not, loss of limbs can be caused by a vaeirty accidents and diseases that don't involve war. You'd think that research and advances in the field of robotics which could help to restore a great deal of life quality and dignity to a great many people would be seen as something positive.I guess the glass is always half empty for some people"Who do you think is behind the funding of this kind of research? The tobacco companies? 'Hey, loss of limbs is no longer an issue with smoking!' Sure, there are plenty of other reasons people lose limbs, but there is a vested interest from certain companies with the cash to have this kind of research done, quite possibly mainly for the army.The US army are almost as bad as the oil and pharmaceutical companies when it comes to doling out the big bucks for research which suits them. I certainly wouldn't put it past them to be behind this research, especially when it coincides with the exoskeleton research.I doubt you're arguing for all wars in general, because that would be ridiculous. So I'm going to have to guess that you're arguing against Bomber himself, in a pathetic attempt at making Bomber look stupid, and that's why you come across looking naive.